Sony v Kodak CCDs

Re: Sony v Kodak CCDs

Postby cybermystic » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:58 pm

DaveS wrote:BTW, although if sold, the H9 it would make a reasonable contribution towards an H16, I really don't think I would part with it, as its a great camera, and the Sony ICX285 is IMO, streets ahead of the Kodak 'chips'.

For me, the H16 would be for the big DSOs, and the H9 for the smaller ones.

Dave


Do not part with the H9 - I sold my H9C when I bought the M25C, biggest mistake I ever made sad1
Greg
Pulsar 7 foot dome, C11 plus Hyperstar III, SXVF-M25C and guider, 2 x Sky 90, Megrez 80, AstroTrac and Canon 40D, many tons of other bits.
http://www.newforestobservatory.com/
User avatar
cybermystic
 
Posts: 1601
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:19 pm
Location: Hampshire, the New Forest

Re: Sony v Kodak CCDs

Postby DaveS » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:48 pm

I didn't sell the H9 Greg, and I certainly don't plan doing so either. :hap:

I decided that it was such a good camera, and that it would compliment the larger format H16. So now I have both :hap:

Dave
Meade 8" LX200ACF, WO FLT 110, SXVR-H16, SXVF-H9, SX Lodestar, DMK21,Meade LPI, NEQ6 Pro Synscan mount, and Observatory.

Web Site: davesastronomy/
User avatar
DaveS
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5044
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:45 pm
Location: South Suffolk, UK.

Previous

Return to Cameras

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest